If you read this article to the end, you will be introduced to a premium money management system for free – so don’t take it for granted and read carefully. Though it’s called “guaranteed profit” money management system, I wouldn’t be so sure about it. If there is one thing I can guarantee you, it’s that there is no guaranteed profit in casino games, period. However, there are odds and you can successfully manipulate them in order to be profitable.
Despite this loud name that might sound fishy, this management system can turn out to be a great tool to control your bankroll and avoid big losses. Using a premium system like this one significantly increases your chances of walking out of the casino with winnings.
Details of “Guaranteed Profit” Management System
The system consists of 4 different levels that look like this:
|Bankroll 350||Bet 1||Bet 2||Bet 3||Bet 4||Bet 5||Net Loss|
|Level 1||1||2||4||8||16||1 – 6|
|Level 2||2||6||12||24||7 – 18|
|Level 3||4||12||24||48||19 – 36|
|Level 4||8||24||48||96||37 – 72|
This method is designed to minimize your risk of losing it all. It will help you to bounce back from a deficit consistently, avoiding risky come-back stakes. The rules are pretty simple:
- Every level starts with bet 1, don’t start the level with the third or fourth bet.
- Net loss is a parameter that shows which level you should be on.
- ONLY MOVE 1 LEVEL at the time. Do not skip levels.
- You should have a bankroll of 350 units to be comfortable. If your single unit is $5, it should be $1 625.
I know it might sound complicated at first, but you’ll get it soon. Let’s simulate a game to get a feel of how it works.
Just imagine that you start a game having a really bad fortune – 5 losses in a row. Even though it’s very unlikely, just go with this scenario for the sake of the experiment. So after 5 straight losses on level 1, you would have a total net loss of 31.
Since you finish the first level, you have to take your result into account and check the net loss graph to determine the next level you should be betting on. Net loss of 31 qualifies for the 3rd level (net loss from 19 to 36) but remember the rule we just taught you – never move up more than 1 level at a time. And never break the rules, or the rules will break you. So instead of jumping straight to the 3rd level, you should go to the 2nd.
If you lose two more bets in a row (-2 and – 6 units) – that’s 7 losses in a row and you have a net loss of 39 units. Let’s say you win your next bet at 12 units and that immediately reduces your net loss from -39 to 27. Now you have a net loss that qualifies for level 3 and you are on the 2nd level, so you can move up to level 3.
If you lose your first bet and win the second on level number 3, your net loss will be just 19 units. The next bet is successful again and your net loss is 15. That means it’s time to move back to level 2. The first two bets are busts and you win the third one, which equals the net loss of 7 units. 7 is right on the line between levels 2 and 1. Again, follow the rules and stay on the second level. You win your next bet and move back to level 1 since your net loss is just 5 units.
It looks like fortune is smiling at you again and you win 4 times in a row, which leaves you with only 1 unit of net loss. Then you lose 2 in a row and win the third bet – you have a profit of 1 unit. At this point, you have successfully bounced back from 39 units deficit and even have a profit of 1 unit. Plus, you have all the profits you earned before this losing streak.
You can notice that at no time we were anywhere near losing the bankroll of 350 units. This simulation that included 8 of the first 9 bets being unsuccessful just proves that “guaranteed money” management system is a great tool to get out of the slump and climb the ladder back steadily. It’s not a really fast way to eliminate the deficit, but it’s working.
In addition to that, it’s worth mentioning that this system is flexible and you can try to recover from losses faster. You can choose to stay on a higher level if you have a net loss that’s on the line. However, it’s definitely riskier and we recommend to be careful about any alternations to this method.